Why AUV

Vessel + ROV vs AUV

Same pipeline. Fewer days, fewer vessel days, less weather risk, lower cost.

Conventional

Vessel + ROV

Tethered, slow, tied to a large spread and the weather window.

Days on a 155 km line19 days
Relative inspection cost100%
Survey speed0.25–0.5 kn
Weather dependencyHigh
People offshore (deepwater spread)35–50
Autonomous

AUV

Untethered, fast, runs below the weather from a smaller vessel.

Days on a 155 km line7 days
Relative inspection costup to −55%
Survey speed3–3.7 kn
Weather dependencyLower
People offshoreFar fewer
0 → 7
Days on a 155 km pipeline pilot
up to 0%
Lower inspection cost reported
~0%
Of pipeline length covered by AUV in one study
FactorVessel + ROVAUV-led
Survey speed0.25–0.5 kn (pipeline following)about 3–3.7 kn
Time on a 155 km pipeline (pilot)19 days7 days
Inspection costBaselineup to 55% lower (reported)
Total survey costBaseline30–40% savings (reported)
Time offshoreBaseline~40% less
VesselLarge DP2 support vesselSmaller DP1 vessel (reported pilot)
People & deck kit35–50 personnel, 75–90 t (deepwater)Compact spread
WeatherUmbilical limits work in high sea statesWorks below the weather once submerged
Data qualityUmbilical-induced motionSteady constant-altitude data
Intervention & close-in work✔ Best tool✘ Not designed for it

The honest bit: right tool, right task

AUVs are not a replacement for every ROV job. ROVs remain the right tool for intervention, repair support and close-in work. The win comes from letting the AUV cover the long survey runs, then sending an ROV only to the spots that need it. In one published study, AUVs covered around 96% of pipeline length.

That is how we work: independent engineering with qualified partners, so each part of the campaign gets the right tool.

Fewer vessel days. Better data.

Tell us about your pipeline or survey area and we will scope an AUV-led campaign.

Figures are drawn from published industry data (technical conference papers, operator pilots and equipment specifications) and are illustrative ranges, not guarantees. Reported results: survey speed about 3–3.7 kn for survey AUVs vs 0.25–0.5 kn for a pipeline-following ROV; inspection time cut from 19 to 7 days on a 155 km pipeline pilot; up to 55% lower inspection cost; 30–40% total survey savings; around 40% less time offshore. Actual results depend on scope, water depth, field conditions and data requirements.